CricketBlog.com

Why Australia lost the 2009 Ashes


When Australia lost the 2005 Ashes, the scapegoating and finger pointing was immediate, fierce and frantic. Billy Bowden. Ricky Ponting. Breath mints. WAGS. God. John Buchanan. Gary Pratt. The loss was such a shock, there was plenty of blame to go around too. However, and despite the fact that the pain of this Ashes loss is still fresh, I think it's possible to offer a dispassionate and logical analysis on where blame lies in our 2009 Ashes loss.

I don't think Ricky Ponting's captaincy was a contributing factor. Sure, he's defensive and unimaginative. But his conservative captaincy was matched and cancelled out by Andrew Strauss' equally conservative captaincy. If anything, the one captaincy howler of the series was Strauss' decision to bat in the 4th Test. It invoked memories of Ponting's decision to bowl at Edgbaston in 2005.

A more likely culprit is the Australian batsmen. It was their first innings collapses at Lords and the Oval which lost us two Tests. The batsman that sticks out like a sore thumb is Mike Hussey. He was Ravi-Bopara-like in the energy and enthusiasm he gave to the fielding team. He was always a wicket just waiting to happen. Sure, he may have saved his position with a futile century yesterday. It's becoming an Australian tradition for one beleagured batsman to save his career with a meaningless century at the Oval every 4 years.

But Mike Hussey is just a symptom. The underlying problem was the selectors had no options, noone to replace him. How could you possibly select a touring Ashes squad with not a single back-up specialist batsman? It seemed unwise at the time. Foresight has only intensified the craziness of the decision.

However, the true cause of Australia's demise goes further back than our batting collapses at Lords and the Oval. The seeds of our Ashes loss were sowed in the 1st Test. We had every opportunity to finish off England on the 5th day. All it needed was one delivery, one jaffa to finish off the English tailenders. Instead, we witnessed with dismay the unravelling of Mitchell Johnson. It took 3 Tests for him to get his groove back. What happened to our devastating spearhead? How did he devolve from the world beating champion in South Africa to the pie chucking farce in Cardiff? Mentally, he wasn't all there. Something was happening off-field that had him distracted on the field. And thus we have our answer.

Why did Australia lose the 2009 Ashes? Mitchell Johnson's mum.


Posted by JC on Mon 24 Aug 35 comments
While I agree with most of what you are saying (Unimaginative captaincy etc) bowling North at the end at Cardiff with 1 wicket to take, in order to gain an extra over or 2 was a by any stretch a howler!
Posted by fitzgeral on 2009-08-24 13:23:57
It was a shocker. But Mitch Johnson had already had ample opportunity to dismiss either tailender in a long spell that was largely ineffectual. If he'd bowled anything like he did to South Africa (or later in this series), we would've won at Cardiff.
Posted by JC on 2009-08-24 15:53:34
MT sums all this up for me in his previous post:
"I think that's the worst part about losing the Ashes - the reaction from the Poms".

I still feel sick in the guts from the collapse but now I have to endure 18 months of gloating, and smart-arse emails and comments from the Pommies all over again! I mean, they've only just got over the knighthoods of the previous Ashes win (our 5-0 apparently doesn't count because it wasn't in England).

Other stuff that doesn't get a mention is their Pakistani bowling coach (Mushy), their South African debutant, their Zimbabwean coach and John 'bloody traiter' Buchanan.

Ponting has to go (but we'll keep him as a batsman (as opposed to a 'batter' thank you very much). And what about all the soccer-style chating and carrying on in the crowd? Twenty-twenty has a lot to answer for.

Beam me up Scotty.
Posted by virtualgaz on 2009-08-24 19:04:23
Agree about the gloating, unfortunately our home ashes is ignored by the Poms (Warnie reffered to them as the forgotten ashes).

Think one major issue has been playing Watson - he is not a match winner, hes not a future prospect, hes not a test player and he was lucky not to get out time and again. Poor Hughes was dumped unceremoniously after two matches, after having virtually set up the series win in South Africa.
Posted by sillypoint on 2009-08-24 20:03:02
Yeah I can't stand the triumphalism when they win. Are we that bad?

For me the reason we lost the Ashes (besids nerves) was the selectors. THhey just don't get it. Saw a pathetic interview with Sunderland and Hilditch where they were feebly defending not selecting Hauritz - "it wouldn't have stopped us getting bowled out for 160" - yeah but we might have bowled THEM out sooner and not been chasing 546 if we had a spinner in the side! And of course they had to trot out the "but we won in South Africa" excuse. What a bunch of morons.

If we'd had Clark at Lords and Hauritz at the Oval we might still have lost, but the point is they didn't select the best side for the conditions.

If the ones at the top don't get it then what hope do we have? What chance Warney becoming a selctor? You'd love it JC - the side would have at least 1 if not 2 spinners!
Posted by MT on 2009-08-24 20:08:41
Reasons for Loss at Oval were simple,

1st: Lack of a spinner. When ur part time spinner picks up 4 wickets then u really r missing something in ur head not pickin up a regular spinner.

The 2nd reason throughout the series was the inability to to wipe off England's tail. Someone please check Broad's and Swann's scores in the series. It would certainly be higher than most Aussie and Pommie batsmen not to forget the importance of those innings.

3rd Reason was Johnson. He let down Aussies in the first 3 and the last test. I include the last test because the pitch was very much India like and Johnson seemed ur best bowler when Aussies' lost to India in India last year.

Last was Aussie's batting. I need not say much about it. Ponting could not bear the booing nor the chatting he received form the Pommies as he is usually at the giving end and not at the receiving end.

Anyway's now that u guys have lost the Ashes and have become No. 4 test team (I don't agree with the rankings esp. Lanka being no. 2 playing minnows like Pakistan and NZ at home and India being no. 3 having not played a Test for ages), u should look to build a new team for the next ashes. the first thing would be to hire Warne as a spinning coach (he is not bad because after last year's stint at Rajasthan Royals under Warne's coaching and captaincy, Ravindra Jadeja went on to become the joint highest wicket taker and Jadeja publicly acknowledges that Warne's tips helped him. 2nd throw out Hussey, and try a few other ppl in the batting department.
Posted by ssukhdial on 2009-08-24 20:59:33
Can someone quickly help me out here?

What did John 'bloody traiter' Buchanan do? What did I miss in the SA media?
Posted by Frost on 2009-08-24 23:47:39
Guys -- I just wanted, as a Pom, to say two things.

First, that some of us here are nothing like as triumphant as 2003. No smugness, no MBEs this time around. Most of us can read the stats: the centuries and wicket taking and realise that we got a bit lucky simply by playing better in the first innnings, sneaking one in Cardiff and getting the better of some duff decisions.

Secondly, and more importantly, to express my admiration for Ponting. What nonsense to say he's unimaginative. He's your best bat, your inspiration and gracious in victory and defeat. A gentleman and a true cricketer. I was truly touched by his shake of the hand to Flintoff when he came into bat for the last time; his resilience after a clout in the mouth. Thank goodness that he got the ovation he deserved at the Oval. I do hope that we see him over here again for the next but one Ashes -- Ponting is a great of the modern game and watching him play has been a privilege. When you've hounded him out; then you'll feel guilty... If the crowd boos, it's because they fear and respect him.
Posted by Jonster on 2009-08-25 08:25:40
Totally agree about Ponting. If he gets the criticism back home that's been forecasted over here, I think it's totally unjustified. Certain members of his team let him down badly, but he dealt with Sunday's events with dignity. He's clearly a good guy, and still your best player. What guarantees do you have that Clarke could do a better job?

On the celebration front - I don't think you guys can fully comprehend what it's like to be on the receiving end of so many thrashings for two whole decades. If you had been, you'd find yourselves going slightly over-the-top with the celebrations. England never used to be a match for the Aussies, and it was frankly embarrassing. Now we are, and we're going to make the most of it. In reply to MT - "Are we that bad?" - I don't know, but it sure hurt like hell watching Warne, McGrath and co doing series victory laps round Perth last time, with two full Tests to come.
Posted by rich on 2009-08-25 16:41:09
Rich what I meant by triumphalism was this: When Australia beat England, do you receive smug emails, phone calls, texts etc for months afterwards mentioning the Ashes? And I know it's not just me - take a look at this article

http://www.theage.com.au/text/articles/2009/08/24/1251001857074.html

At least it makes a change from convict jokes.

I do remember Aus getting thrashed for a decade in the 80s, and I can remember losing an Ashes Test by 4 runs with Border and Thommo making a last stand!

To tell you the truth, I think it's the whole "colonial" thing that gives and edge to the Ashes. Is it the same with the England/South Africa series? Will be interesting to see what happens if both Trott and Pietersen go to SA.

Anyway good to see the two captains were gracious in defeat and victory.
Posted by MT on 2009-08-25 17:21:44
Maybe the English over-reaction is the same as the reaction when Australia made the soccer world cup - everyone went absolutely off because we suck at the sport. The overreaction is more ironic because Australians hate soccer. Let's face it, it's a boring sport (spoken by a guy who'll happily watch a 5 day game which often doesn't have a result).
Posted by JC on 2009-08-25 18:36:50
And JC, don't forget that the origins of T20 are entirely with soccer... the 90minute attention span, the dumbed down rules, the chanting, the crowd participation, razzle, the uniforms and lack of any real skill.
Posted by virtualgaz on 2009-08-26 16:06:42
Hello everybody i am back on cricket blog after a long break. I enjoyed ashes 2009 completely. From the last over in cardiff to the magic throw of freedie to dismiss ponting. I want to make some points here. I have never considered ponting a great captain even when he was going great guns but he is not a bad captain either as a captain i always rated him as 6/10. But one point i would like to ask all australians on this blog. I think aussies selectors are completely hopeless. I cant understand the theory of removing hughes just after 3 innings and one of which strauss catch was not clear. And if you are removing him whats the logic of replacing him with watson. Who didnt deserve to be in any test side forget australia. Why they are not giving shaun marsh a chance who is young and talented. Aussie selectors just want to frustrate the young talented players and give chances to oldies who dont have any future. Why hussy was not given a chance earlier why marcus north was not given a chance earlier. And why stuart Law if u all remember given a chance at the age of 29. Except ponting and clark they have never given chance to any young player. They are also spoiling the career of shaun tait. Dont blame ponting for the loss blame your selectors.
Posted by Jatinder on 2009-08-26 17:10:58
Not quite sure I agree with you saying it's Johnson's fault. Although his form was definitely a contributing factor in the first and second Tests, we didn't lost at Cardiff, and it was the first innings batting collapse that lost Lord's for us. I'd probably place the blame on an inability for all parts of the Australian touring party to adapt to the conditions. The bowlers couldn't swing it as consistently as Anderson and Onions (Headingley excepted), and the selectors persisted with picking the wrong sides for every Test barring Headingley.
Posted by kirby on 2009-08-26 17:46:43
I'm being facetious blaming it on Johnson - that was just an avenue to blaming it on his mum. I place most of the blame on the Australian selectors - not so much for choosing the wrong side on tour but for choosing the wrong squad in the first place. Hussey desperately needed replacing. I had no problem with Phil Hughes getting dropped - he obviously was all at sea - but needed to be replaced with a proper opening batsman.
Posted by JC on 2009-08-27 19:12:16
I see what you mean MT. I think it's something to do with regaining the Ashes, rather than retaining them. In the nineties, when you beating us seemed the natural way of things and a true contest was all but non-existent, I don't remember Aussie fans being overly gloating. Then we won it in 05, made it a pretty big deal, and subsequently (in my experience) Aussie fans did the same in 07. No problem with that - bragging rights are one of the joys (or frustrations) of supporting teams. If you can't make the most of an Ashes win then what can you?

Do you think the selectors will be brave enough to drop Watson as an opener?
Posted by rich on 2009-08-28 03:50:23
I seem to recall Allan Border coming back from England with the urn and a 3-1 victory. The main question was "what the hell happened with the 1?!"
Posted by JC on 2009-08-28 11:35:13
All my oz friends are thinking that they will win ashes easily in 2010 as they did in 2006. Dont take it badly but it wouldnt be as easy as 2006 becoz you dont have warne,gilly and mcgrath. Lee wouldnt be that sharp and you cant win ashes with bowlers like hilfe,siddle and hauritz. I agree that siddle and hilfi performed well in this ashes but they are not match winners and about hauritz Geoffery(boycott) was saying even my mother can play him(HAHA). You have to admit that you have enjoyed a lot of success just by having champions like warne and gilly now they are no more there as far as gilly haddin is a good replacement for him but for warne and seamers hauritz is not even 10% of warne leave hauritz no other spinner is even 10% of warne. I remember last year ponting was trying to win tests in india by keeping cameron white and clarke as spinners i cant stop laughing. And above all aussies selectors are nothing but a bunch of jokers who has ruined the career of many players brad hodge,stuart law,shaun tait to name a few and hughes,shaun marsh for the future. Did u have any answers my oz friends???
Posted by jatinder on 2009-08-28 18:01:33
Well I think to develop spinners we need to pick one and stick with him. Warne was pretty bad in his first few Tests but the selectors persevered. Now they seem to expect another ready made Warne to suddenly pop out of the woodwork.

maybe Warne could be a selector one day!

I think Hughes they have earmarked for the future once he works his game out. Katich will retire sometime in the next few years and I can't imagine Watson staying as opener for that long either. He might move down when Hussey retires/is dropped.

And don't remind us of the White as the main spinner debacle in India. We were laughing stocks!
Posted by MT on 2009-08-28 19:08:18
You are right MT but nothing will happen overnight we have also struggled years for good fast bowlers but now we have some good ones. You people at least have a good system to produce good players. Our(indian) system is totally pathetic and corrupt. Its just becoz the game is so popular here and we are more than 1 billion we produce good players. Our selectors have also been pathetic for years and still they are but aussies selectors are hopeless i dont know what they get by teaching young players that an aussie team spot is such a big thing. Why they always prefer oldies over young guns. I wanna know????
Posted by jatinder on 2009-08-28 20:54:20
Actually i cant understand why people think ponting is responsible for lose of Ashes. I think the selection comity is responsible for that thing.
Posted by seoexper19 on 2009-09-11 03:32:45
I think England can give a big thanks to the groundsman, Bill Gordon for the pitch he prepared and Ponting's awful record of winning the toss. Maybe he should call tails for a change? There's no way that a pitch like that would have been prepared if Warne was in the team. Plus the covers didn't go on till really late after the one and only rain shower - was it a coincidence that immediately after the shower Broad ripped through our bowling line up - the only time the ball swung in the whole match?
Posted by MT on 2009-09-12 14:35:37
Australia lost the series because of its over confidence.

http://www.goarticles.com/cgi-bin/showa.cgi?C=2222539
Posted by Addisonhype on 2009-11-27 19:37:21
Australia is unlucky that they have no pure chucker like Murali.

http://www.goarticles.com/cgi-bin/showa.cgi?C=2257792
Posted by Addisonhype on 2009-12-02 00:22:07
I am impressed from this post....the person who create this post it was a great human..thanks for shared this with us.i found this informative and interesting blog so i think so its very useful and knowledge able.I would like to thank you for the efforts you have made in writing this article.
club penguin cheats
Posted by dontcry on 2009-12-29 13:07:57
I think Australia lost simply because they didn't play cricket fine sufficient and because they were flying high in the sky thinking that they were top things.

Regards
online casino
Posted by Bob Vaughan on 2010-01-23 23:18:08
Fitch store in general Abercrombie And Fitch , everything a good matrimony before marriage have nothing to retain the preceding "female mad batch - Abercrombie" part of the two is the first home in new york city a horde promotion sportswear for men and it is a successful lawyer, that is, fitch.Ezra fitch in a charge over a very intricate to read from the abercrombie is obstinate to read and long abercrombie & fitch. He's also very good brand Abercrombie and Fitch Hoodies, including Abercrombie And Fitch Clothing and Abercrombie and Fitch JeansAbercrombie and Fitch PantsAbercrombie and Fitch Tees. Has become a fashionable personage's first choice, Abercrombie and Fitch Sweaters is all over the world, of course, is also expected to Abercrombie and Fitch Shorts.
New Year was coming, everyone wants new clothes to disguise themselves,Abercrombie Clothing is a good choice. BecauseAbercrombie Sale is a well-known brand, Abercrombie and Fitch Outerwearseverywhere, abercrombie is very much a Cheap Abercrombie. There has Abercrombie and Fitch Polos, Abercrombie Womens and Abercrombie and Fitch Shirts. Personally, I'm looking forward to Abercrombie Hollister's 2009 New Arrivals, such as Abercrombie Ruehl No.925 like this style. 4523234
Posted by CYJISGOD on 2010-01-26 11:28:29
Fitch store in general Abercrombie And Fitch , everything a good matrimony before marriage have nothing to retain the preceding "female mad batch - Abercrombie" part of the two is the first home in new york city a horde promotion sportswear for men and it is a successful lawyer, that is, ezra fitch.Ezra fitch in a charge over a very intricate to read from the Abercrombie And Fitchis obstinate to read and long abercrombie & fitch. He's also very good brand Abercrombie and Fitch Hoodies, including Abercrombie And Fitch Clothing and Abercrombie and Fitch Jeans, Abercrombie and Fitch PantsAbercrombie and Fitch Tees. Has become a fashionable personage's first choice, Abercrombie and Fitch Sweaters is all over the world, of course, is also expected to Abercrombie and Fitch Shorts.
New Year was coming, everyone wants new clothes to disguise themselves,Abercrombie Clothing is a good choice. BecauseAbercrombie Sale is a well-known brand, Abercrombie and Fitch Outerwearseverywhere, abercrombie is very much a Cheap Abercrombie. There has Abercrombie and Fitch PolosAbercrombie and Fitch Jeans and Abercrombie SaleShirts. Personally, I'm looking forward to Abercrombie Hollister's 2009 New Arrivals, such as Abercrombie and Fitch Shirts like this style. dfgsdf4
Posted by CYJISGOD on 2010-01-29 18:09:42
Your blog keeps getting better and better! Your older articles are not as good as newer ones you have a lot more creativity and originality now keep it up!
Signature
---------
Personal Blog : Astaga.com lifestyle on the net
Name : Anti
Nationality : Indonesia
Posted by scamanti on 2010-02-03 07:59:43
Male tongue-shaped 25 # (Type II semi-) shoes stretch, kind of a long stretch at the end of 265 mm, 236 mm stretch plantar Wai, put margin 20 mm,gucci belts, adhesive technology, full grain cow leather, with a high 20 to 30 mm. A calculation and positioning components Bar tongue-shaped leather upper parts of their divided into: Wai cover (or inlay cover), a long article Wai (Wai section can be divided into two parts and post in the help), tongue, outsourcing with, bar and bar on the The Denis or other decorative parts,cheap supras, etc., a total of six parts. A total of 14 anchor points,cheap uggs, including the former to help the length of points, the length of the former to help Wai point, mouth gate length of the point, mouth gate width points,nike free 5.0, lateral malleolus to help high after helping the seam height points, bar width and length of the anchor point, rubber band cloth anchor point,cheap ugg boots, outsourcing to keep up with the next location point, tongue length and width of the positioning points. If the article is divided into short-Wai Cheung Wai,abercrombie and fitch, and after the help of two components,nike free everyday, but also need to have in place to help access help line. 1. The length of the former gang-point: the former gang-like length = stretch at the end of a long ¡Á 63% = 265 mm ¡Á 0.63 = 167 mm 2. The length of the former gang Wai points: the former help Wai length = stretch at the end of kind of a long ¡Á 10% = 265 mm ¡Á 0.10 = 26.5 mm 3. Entrance Length points: I like the door at the end of a long stretch the length of = ¡Á 40% = 265 mm ¡Á 0.40 = 106 mm 4. Port gate width points: calculation method: port gate width = stretch plantar Wai ¡Á 17% = 236 mm ¡Á 0.17 = 40 mm Experience in law:-last-of-plane width midpoint plus 2 ~ 3 mm 5. Lateral malleolus to help high: 47 mm 6. After helping the seam height of points: 61 mm 7. Tongue design: 8. Outsourcing with the design: the width 50 mm, width 70 mm under 9. Bar design: the bottom of super-position of exit doors for more than 10 ~ 12 ©L 10. Rubber cloth Location: away from the dorsal midline 12 ~ 13 mm, 15 mm from the tongue back over the design depends on the width of rubber cloth rubber cloth specifications,cheap gucci shoes, usually 16 ~ 20 mm 11. Access to help line position in the gang: the first,cheap gucci sneakers, medial and lateral malleolus are disconnected The second, broken ankle, lateral malleolus been opened The third, medial and lateral malleolus do not disconnect the Two contour lines painted parts 1. Circuit design is very important to cover contour lines, is tongue-shaped shoes of the face, front stretch contour body shape of the first type should be coordinated, Wai cover lines before, during and rear treatment should reflect the aesthetics and accuracy to be high. 2. Bar design is an important decorative part of this style,nike free 3.0, features should be clear. The direction of the general bar entrances should be consistent contour, so that contour lines at the entrances of the center of location bar. 3. Cloth-covered rubber was tongue contour drawing should be marked clearly. 4. After the use of a package to help singalong edge technology, should be clearly marked painted, generally after the second half to help contour similar to a straight line mi; the first part with the rubber cloth connected to a larger degree of bending. 5. Wai Gai positioning point,ugg boots uk, we must note that the design into the shoe size and the actual size of the difference. After helping pull taut the role of displacement will occur, where displacement of about 2 ~ 4 mm,jordan shoes, so positioning should be painted like this place Move one point 2 ~ 4 mm. 3 making seed sample (1) to retain the former bar to help Wai landmark points on the article. If the article is divided into long-Wai Wai help before and after the help of two parts,abercrombie & fitch, the bar,men's belts, a sign points will fall on the post in the help, also need to clearly marked. (2) Remove the rubber cloth strictly seed model. (3) If there are other decorative pieces on the bar or decoration Browne,ugg boots, should also retain its landmarks.
Posted by daka1230 on 2010-02-04 05:36:17
William J. Riley,founded the New Balance Arch Support Company, which manufactured arch supports and other accessories designed to improve shoe fit.
Posted by cindyrain on 2010-02-04 16:37:37
I will forward this article to him. Pretty sure he will have a good read. Thanks for sharing!
online graduate Diploma | PhD Political Science | Nursing Diploma | doctorate degree journalism | mass communications diploma
Posted by bozozo on 2010-02-04 21:36:05

Post New Comment

You need to be logged in to post a comment. If you're new, register here. Existing users, login via the right margin.